Despite best intentions, board members can occasionally become disengaged from their vital oversight responsibilities. This is often the result of poor group dynamics — rivalries or dominance by a few directors, and a lack of communication. These hinder the board from participating in the collective decision-making process necessary for effective decision-making.

The board could also not have the proper internal structures that will allow it to carry its duties of performance assessment. This typically involves establishing committees or officer positions which are responsible for gathering, analysing and bringing evaluation results to the board for discussion. It is highly unlikely that the board will be able effectively oversee these aspects if they’re left to the CEO and management team.

The board could not be able to judge the overall performance of its company if it doesn’t include behavioural factors in the evaluation of individual directors’ contributions. This results in a routine process that is conducted to satisfy listing requirements, or to make a statement to good governance.

Fortunately, there are many ways for boards to elevate their performance and ensure they’re http://boardroompro.net/5-organizational-assessment-tools-for-nonprofits meeting their fiduciary responsibilities. The first step is to concentrate on the quality of interactions between people in the boardroom. This can be achieved by ensuring that the board is adaptable and resilient, as well as strategic in its nature. It’s also essential to provide the right mix of skills and experiences and gender diversity. This allows the board a more diverse set of perspectives to be gained and allows them to better address important issues. It can also help the board establish an environment of collaboration that encourages open communication and a variety of perspectives.